Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:44:28 +0200
From:      Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Just how standard is APM?
Message-ID:  <3A556D4C.44B553C0@cequrux.com>
References:  <3A545615.3597BCF3@cequrux.com> <200101042234.f04MYM147333@harmony.village.org> <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> <20010105024436.A2700@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <3A5582FE.767A617D@newsguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> 
> If this is still about the Presario laptop, APM works (or did up to
> november) on the Compaq Presario 1621. Note the apm and acpi can't be
> used together in the same kernel.

It's a 1700; previously I had a 1600 which worked better with everything
(the VIA sound was supported, the APM BIOS worked, etc). It had a flaky
touchpad, so I exchanged it, and took a 1700 because I wanted the CD-RW
drive and lighter weight - but now I have lots of unsupported hardware
(Conexant LANtastic Ethernet/modem, ESS1988 Allegro sound, and, it
seems, ACPI - which is unsupported in -stable, I gather). Fortunately I
have a 3Com PCMCIA EtherNIC, so I have enough working to make it quite
usable with FreeBSD anyway.

-- 
Dr Graham Wheeler                        E-mail: gram@cequrux.com
Director, Research and Development       WWW:    http://www.cequrux.com
CEQURUX Technologies                     Phone:  +27(21)423-6065
Firewalls/VPN Specialists                Fax:    +27(21)424-3656


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A556D4C.44B553C0>