Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Jul 1997 18:52:56 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hosokawa@jp.freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pccard and -current; a long way to go. :-( 
Message-ID:  <199707280052.SAA02793@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <6019.869903071@critter.dk.tfs.com>
References:  <20225.869879961@time.cdrom.com> <6019.869903071@critter.dk.tfs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> right back then, I can confidently say that to get our "removable
> device" support into a decent shape will take some work.
> 
> The Nomads work are pretty focused on pccards, but in the same framework
> we should look at CardBus, docking stations, hot-plug PCI and goddamnit:
> PlugAndPray since this is the mechanism that is supposed to make support
> for all these things managable.
> 
> As usual, if you start to fiddle this stuff, you hit your head on the
> usual suspects:
> 
> 	1. Improved support for loadable devices.
> 	2. Real mode BIOS calls.
> 	3. A Registry.
> 	4. (optional:) pageable kernel modules.

You forgot:
        5. Device drivers that actually 'give up' resources when not in
           use, such as interrupts, ports, etc...  You can't currently
           'unload' an IRQ right now safely.



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707280052.SAA02793>