Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:32:36 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update - new hal flag to force a full chip reset Message-ID: <1397604832.20111107113236@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmonu%2Bu61TxXUPdVBq8B4-9qec06LeVpAKi5PS_9kEMHE3w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmomPuBs_51-X8Pin4MPtek507EUe5yjJbKhv906FtHAMZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonNPmLcCQGHHQkix0-a2X70LSUng9gXMqWikM1A8yQ_sg@mail.gmail.com> <939228459.20111106231805@serebryakov.spb.ru> <2230529.Gp80hNdgYq@snifi> <CAJ-Vmonu%2Bu61TxXUPdVBq8B4-9qec06LeVpAKi5PS_9kEMHE3w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 7 =ED=EE=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 3:27:24: > Just stick with the AR9220/AR9280 NICs. I have to fix this stuff, > right? So unless you absolutely, positively require stuff right now > (and if you do, grab an AR9160), stick with the AR9220/AR9280. :) I'm planning alternative paths in case it is broken silicon. You have noticed, that ath9k has same problems... > I haven't (re) tested the AR9285/AR9287 in congested 2.4ghz mode. I'll > try to do that this week. The question is, which cards in Mini-PCI format is based on AR9160 and AR9285... BTW, I didn't get the message I'm answering here and the message from Maciej Milewski on the list -- only my personal copies :( --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1397604832.20111107113236>