Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:21:45 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pcib_acpi.c src/sys/i386/pci pci_bus.c
Message-ID:  <432B1B49.2010400@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <200509160702.j8G72TBv063544@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200509160702.j8G72TBv063544@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
> imp         2005-09-16 07:02:29 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/dev/acpica       acpi_pcib_acpi.c 
>     sys/i386/pci         pci_bus.c 
>   Log:
>   Commit a workaround to a problem with resource allocation.  This helps
>   with some Dell servers that booted w/o a problem[*] on 5.4, but failed
>   with 6.0-BETA.
>   
>   On the PCI bus, when we do lazy resource allocation, we narrow the
>   range requested as we pass through bridges to reflect how the bridges
>   are programmed and what addresses they pass.  However, when we're
>   doing an allocation on a bus that's directly connected to a host
>   bridge, no such translation can take place.  We already had a fallback
>   range for memory requests, but none for ioports.  As such, provide a
>   fallback for I/O ports so we don't allocate location 0, which will
>   have undesired side effects when the resources are actually used.
>   
>   This fixes a problem with booting a Dell server with usb in the
>   kernel.  However, it is an unsatisfying solution.  I don't like the
>   hard coded value, and I think we should start narrowing the resources
>   returned to not be in the so-called isa alias area (where the ranage &
>   0x0300 must be 0 iirc).  Doing such filtering will have to wait for
>   another day.
>   
>   This may be a good 6 candidate, maybe after its had a chance to be
>   refined.
>   
>   Tested by: glebius@
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.49      +2 -0      src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c
>   1.120     +2 -0      src/sys/i386/pci/pci_bus.c

Only the ACPI side of this patch works.  The legacy PCI side has no 
effect on the problem.

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?432B1B49.2010400>