Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:18:39 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Build Ports Without X11? Message-ID: <53D7F38F.9030808@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVH-nJfZBAcy1GvQ91oOMKZPMAR9i7d_POx--x_j2Mtvag@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHzLAVH-nJfZBAcy1GvQ91oOMKZPMAR9i7d_POx--x_j2Mtvag@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
29.07.2014 23:04, Rick Miller пишет: > Hi all, > > I am using Poudriere to bulk build packages and encountered a failure that > resulted in the program skipping a couple ports. The failure occurred due > to an X11 error. However, the expectation is that all ports would build > without X11 thus negating the need to compile and build all the X11 > dependancies for various packages. > > Despite the make.conf (shown below) specifying WITHOUT_X11, all these ports > built with X11 support anyway. > > I'm pretty sure I must be doing something wrong and hoping that someone > might be able to lead me to the solution that will compile any port without > X11 support. > > Packages failed/skipped: > > gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.22: failed > gtk2-2.24.22_3: skipped due to above failure > vim-7.4.364: skipped due to above failure > > make.conf: > > # cat 10_0-amd64-make.conf > WITH_PKGNG=YES > PERL_VERSION=5.16.3 > WITHOUT_X11=YES I'd say that the last line should be: ----- OPTIONS_UNSET=X11 ----- Well, and the port also should be configured to use option X11. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D7F38F.9030808>