Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 00:35:21 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? Message-ID: <199810050735.AAA00870@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Oct 1998 15:54:42 %2B1000." <199810050554.PAA28570@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I'm not trying to be combative here; this is not a religious issue to > >> me... The current behavior just seems to me to violate POLA. > > > >Only if you have misapprehensions about what 'make includes' does. It > >seems mostly to trip up people with such misapprehensions. > > `includes' is a private target in src/Makefile for installing [all] the > includes. It isn't, and has not been for years. It might be meant to, which is a different matter entirely. It's also broken by design (includes should live with the code they describe). -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810050735.AAA00870>