Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:43:51 +0300 From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4) Message-ID: <750AF539-C163-428C-B930-25E08EC565FB@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA51544.9080103@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100923.053236.231630719.hrs@allbsd.org> <4CA26BB7.2090907@FreeBSD.org> <89382820-E423-432E-8346-ADABB9FEED7F@FreeBSD.org> <4CA4E221.4060107@FreeBSD.org> <175A9E47-8457-47A6-9CA1-BDBDC407961C@FreeBSD.org> <4CA51544.9080103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-112-521670312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 2010-10-1, at 1:55, Doug Barton wrote: > My point about FreeBSD 9 is that if we add the 6rd code today, then > release 9.0 in about a year, then support the RELENG_9 branch for 4-6 > years that we will still be maintaining code that no one has any use > for. Sorry if I wasn't clear. You're seriously underestimating the transition time needed for IPv6. Lars --Apple-Mail-112-521670312--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?750AF539-C163-428C-B930-25E08EC565FB>