Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 18:02:05 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Vlad Skvortsov <vlad@high.net.ru>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind vulnerabilities Message-ID: <4.1.19991123175926.04d892f0@granite.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <19991123235738.D595@high.net.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:57 PM 11/23/99 , Vlad Skvortsov wrote: > Sorry for probably a bit stupid question (I've been out of lists for > a while). Are patches for named already in -current or -stable ? > No they have not to either. Use it out of the ports. Be sure to adjust named-xfer "/usr/local/libexec/named-xfer"; // _PATH_XFER accordingly in your named.conf file. This raises a question, why has the new BIND not been committed to current at least ? I am not complaining, just curious as to the rationale ? ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 519 651 3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19991123175926.04d892f0>