Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 1998 18:13:03 +0100
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        "Alton, Matthew" <Matthew.Alton@anheuser-busch.com>, "'Farshidoo'" <farshidoo@yahoo.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is LFS operational?
Message-ID:  <19981130181303.Q9226@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF9017766BD@STLABCEXG011>; from Alton, Matthew on Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 04:03:50PM -0000
References:  <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF9017766BD@STLABCEXG011>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 04:03:50PM -0000, Alton, Matthew wrote:
> Well, I'm not going to win this year's Richard Stallman think-alike
> contest.  I actually don't mind the notion of my code being used by Sun
> or HP or even IBM in a closed product.
> 
> It's just that the thought of my code being assimilated into a binary-only
> Redmond/Borg broken kludge makes me want to hurl chow (regurgitate).

May I suggest you use the NPL (not MPL) instead of GPL, then?  It
allow you to change your mind at a later point in time, and do other
trade-offs that are in favour of the best use of your software.

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981130181303.Q9226>