Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:43:08 +0000 From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> To: "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in routing tables ? Message-ID: <20051126214308.GA28606@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <43872BA1.7060203@yahoo.com.br> References: <4385EA35.9080705@yahoo.com.br> <20051125143716.GA98953@uk.tiscali.com> <43872BA1.7060203@yahoo.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:20:01PM -0200, Ricardo A. Reis wrote: > But i use route add 200.144.xx.xx/[mask] 172.22.xx.xx for > many year, and this work perfectly on freebsd and linux. Yes it does (as of a couple of years ago, I think). However if you want to specify the netmask explicitly instead of a prefix length, as the O.P. did, then you have to include the '-netmask' keyword.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051126214308.GA28606>