Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:42:18 +0900 From: SUZUKI Shinsuke <suz@kame.net> To: molter@tin.it Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler Message-ID: <x7r7nrgsol.wl%suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20041021213248.223cab2c.molter@tin.it> References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> <20041021153933.GK13756@empiric.icir.org> <4177E25E.804639E@freebsd.org> <20041021213248.223cab2c.molter@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:32:48 +0200 >>>>> molter@tin.it(Marco Molteni) said: > SCTP in KAME is complete, stable and fully supported. > It is mainly developed by the SCTP RFC author, Randall Stewart. KAME Project haven't received SCTP-related bug report so much, and I think it's due to a lack of testers, SCTP-API standard, and SCTP-ready applications. #Sometimes KAME SNAP compilation fails in SCTP and non-SCTP #application fails in compilation due to a change by SCTP. So it's #difficult to conclude that SCTP is already stable... So I'm not still sure if SCTP in KAME is complete and stable enough to merge into -current. (If someone can contribute to this kind of evaluation, it's quite appreciated, of course!) Thanks, ---- SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x7r7nrgsol.wl%suz>