Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:03:23 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmanager modifying bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <1236618203.1680.20.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <20090309143803.2d5ec944@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <49B41108.8060105@telenix.org> <20090308210404.3895216d@gumby.homeunix.com> <20090309143803.2d5ec944@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-20RHPZuam/cl5ytoaqnl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:38 +0000, RW wrote: > I think this was probably intended for the list rather than me: >=20 > On Mar 8, 4:04 pm, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400 > > > > Chuck Robey <chu...@telenix.org> wrote: =20 > > > Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me > > > what's causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why > > > the patchfile should be so far off, and what might be the CORRECT > > > way to fix this. Oh, BTW, I run current, and keep myself that way > > > via cvsup.. =20 > > > > IIRC the patch was made so that when portmanager built a port, the > > makefile would call back into portmanager to let it modify the > > dependencies. Portmanager had a major rewrite just before the > > original author had a row with some FreeBSD people and abandoned the > > project. AFAIK the feature wasn't yet used, so it doesn't matter if > > the patch doesn't apply since it's a null operation. >=20 >=20 > I'm the original author of portmanager, haven't done anything bsd > related in a few years so memory is a bit vague. > I think the patch was to correct a sorting problem with dependencies > in freebsd make. I filed a pr against make > and was assured there was no way it would ever approved so that patch > is a work around. If it is failing, isn't really > a big surprise, means something has changed in make finally. Best > solution I guess is to determine if make > was fixed somewhere along the line, maybey look up the pr i filed > agains make? if its fixed now, then remove the patch, > if not, then someone who understands scripts needs to recut the > patch. I drive a semi for a living now and seriously > doubt I'll ever take up programming again for lack of time, so very > sorry I'm not able to provide more help with this problem. Mike, Thanks for the info. Yes, bsd.port.mk changed about a year or so ago now... portmanager still did what I needed it to do, so I just ignored it. I will try and find the old, PR and have a look. thanks, robert. > Mike Shultz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD --=-20RHPZuam/cl5ytoaqnl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkm1S9sACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPlSACfXyQwC65hWYgZ21B1P1+vRvcQ 1FMAmwVyr3NByAYAdBQJYDrzyrXKam6e =LZ35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-20RHPZuam/cl5ytoaqnl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1236618203.1680.20.camel>