Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:20:12 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: offsetof in stddef [was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf param.c ... ] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010301417230.52618-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <39FCE2FB.98301D13@cup.hp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > The reason stddef was included was for offsetof (at least for the > genassym files). This we don't have to do know, but shouldn't we also > define offsetof in stddef.h the same as in sys/types.h (in terms of > __offsetof) to avoid redundancy? We do, but the definition in <sys/types.h> has some lexical differences in order to expose broken kernel code that includes <stddef.h>. It shouldn't be in <sys/types.h> anyway. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010301417230.52618-100000>