Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:35:40 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Alex Keahan <alex@hightemplar.com> Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history Message-ID: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <34301.1088242340@critter.freebsd.dk> <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300 > Alex Keahan <alex@hightemplar.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4? Solaris/x86 is being > > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct. > > Solaris/x86 is a niche product. > [...] That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary comp= at=20 _work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't=20 checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA3XuzXhc68WspdLARAuZyAJ47uchd8S6NuxBUGMHwjU+4PvSIbwCfTOaQ uhUknOhDMZqTBIDZWczr6Rg= =5+s7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock>