Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:05:44 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Makoto MATSUSHITA <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why 'lnc.ko' instead of 'if_lnc.ko' ? Message-ID: <200012201805.eBKI5is41536@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:18:01 %2B0900." <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Makoto MATSUSHITA-san writes: : However, this kernel module is named as 'lnc.ko'. Other ethernet : driver modules are named as 'if_XXX.ko'; why lnc doesn't obey this : name convension? Typo, or a new name scheme is used instead? Typo, I think. The module needs to be named if_XXX.ko for the automatic kldload in ifconfig to work. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012201805.eBKI5is41536>