Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
From:      Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   docs/61585: small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
Message-ID:  <200401191701.i0JH1mhv069536@www.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <200401191710.i0JHA7Ej048040@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         61585
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jan 19 09:10:07 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Rostislav Krasny
>Release:        5.2-RELEASE
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
      "Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko" <doublef@tele-kom.ru> suggested me
      send this doc PR. This is a copy of its response email:

      > I thought that I found a typo in the arch-handbook and I wrote about
      > that to the freebsd-doc mailing list. You can read that email at
      > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040117005106.21558.qmail
      > I didn't get any response yet. Maybe I'm missing something and this
      > isn't a typo? What is "posh" instruction? :-))

      Yes, it's pushf with fewer letters and spelled differently... Send a 
      doc
      PR. BTW, I think I understand the phrase about `real mode instructions'
      correctly, but I'd change it to `instructions which mess with the
      physical interrupt flag', as I think that's more correct, as these are
      not necessarily real mode instructions.

      And this is my original typo report:

      The "1.5 boot2 stage" section of the arch-handbook have following text:

      virtual v86 mode. That means, the BTX is a v86 monitor. Real mode
      instructions like posh, popf, cli, sti, if called by the client, will
      work.

      What is "posh" instruction? IMHO it should be changed to "pushf" one.
>How-To-Repeat:
      Just read the "1.5 boot2 stage" section of arch-handbook
>Fix:
      The "posh" instruction should be changed to the "pushf" one
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401191701.i0JH1mhv069536>