Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 03:04:17 -0700 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: Joshua Peck Macdonald <jmacd@freefall.cdrom.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: f77/g77 Message-ID: <199505151004.DAA02245@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199505150938.CAA02156@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Now, to reply to your post.... :)
* install it--it already has ada rules). So fine, what I think
* could be done rather easily and I'd be willing to help after finals
* is patch up gcc.c a little, remove /usr/bin/f2c and /usr/bin/f77 from
* the source tree and make a port of them. I don't know if anything
* needs libf2c in the core distribution, does anything? The ports that
Yes, I think that's a good idea, of course I need to ask "core" and
the other maintainers about this first but in general I'm in favor of
pulling out non-essential components into ports.
Well, for f77 and g77, we have a problem of both eating .f files so as
you said, I guess we'd just install the driver in /usr/local/bin and
the compilers in /usr/local/libexec as we are doing now.
For gnat, it might help if we can make the system gcc.c look into
/usr/local/libexec as well as /usr/libexec, right? Or maybe it's
better if we install a shell script in /usr/local/bin that calls the
system gcc with the correct arguments ("-B/usr/local/libexec"?), does
it need to look into libraries and stuff in /usr/local as well?
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505151004.DAA02245>