Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:47:58 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc-ooo Makefile ports/lang/gcc-ooo/files extrapatch-gcc__config__freebsd-spec.h Message-ID: <20041217224758.GA7744@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200412172042.59127.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200412171750.iBHHoL2V076953@repoman.freebsd.org> <200412171949.08184.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20041217192149.GA28616@dragon.nuxi.com> <200412172042.59127.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 08:42:54PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 17. December 2004 20:21, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On Friday, 17. December 2004 18:50, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > > obrien 2004-12-17 17:50:20 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > lang/gcc-ooo Makefile > > > > Removed files: > > > > lang/gcc-ooo/files extrapatch-gcc__config__freebsd-spec.h > > > > Log: > > > > We've ended up with the same patch twice, I guess Maho-san's and my > > > > emails crossed each other. > > > > > > Except the other patch is better since it doesn't break 5.2.1-RELEASE > > > users. Mind putting that one in again? > > > > No. The correct patch is one that embodies the proper knowledge into > > GCC. The patch will do that. > > Okay, the new patch looks better, thanks. Might be worthwhile applying > upstream, too. Already did 2 days ago. :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041217224758.GA7744>