Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:41:11 -0800 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Hiten Pandya <hiten.pandya@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libc malloc patch Message-ID: <7AA89647-5ABE-43C9-8BB0-57E04D2F66A4@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <9b1858120511290252w1e6d3458m@mail.gmail.com> References: <B6653214-2181-4342-854D-323979D23EE8@canonware.com> <9b1858120511290252w1e6d3458m@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 29, 2005, at 2:52 AM, Hiten Pandya wrote: > I see that you have included an implementation of red-black tree CPP > macros, but wouldn't it be better if you were to use the ones in > <sys/tree.h> ? I have only had a precursory look, but I would have > thought that would be the way to go. There is a feature missing from sys/tree.h that I need (rb_nsearch() in the patch), but you are right that it would probably be best to use sys/tree.h. I am going to work on adding RB_NFIND(), and will then try switching to sys/tree.h. Thanks, Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7AA89647-5ABE-43C9-8BB0-57E04D2F66A4>