Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 09:19:27 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: ringworm@inbox.lv Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager Message-ID: <200501010919.28576.reso3w83@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20050101123033.GA66956@pooh.nagual.st> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1041228125628.90195C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200412281128.46165.reso3w83@verizon.net> <20050101123033.GA66956@pooh.nagual.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable > > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly > > updating ports. > > Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL > the old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is not possible then? correct, for now. I like the idea of what your suggestion though I think, if you mean being able to upgrade on port and its dependencies. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501010919.28576.reso3w83>