Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:33:30 -0500
From:      stan <stanb@panix.com>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: A question about the rrd tools port
Message-ID:  <20090104193330.GA14428@teddy.fas.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090104173644.GA4100@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <20090104172542.GA11950@teddy.fas.com> <20090104173644.GA4100@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:36:44AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:25:42PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > The rrd tools port installs a number of man pages fr executables that it
> > does not seem to provide. ...
> > 
> > Is my assumpion correct, and if so, why ae these links not created?
> 
> It looks to me as if at least some of the man pages installed by rrdtool
> do not have corresponding executables because they are purely
> documentation:  e.g., bin_dec_hex; cdeftutorial; rpntutorial;
> rrdgraph_examples.

OK, here is an example of what I am asking about "rrdrestore". The function
can be done with rrdtool import, but why is tere a man page, if there is
not intended to be  an executable, or a llink?

-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090104193330.GA14428>