Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:28:41 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To:        Tristan <tris@infoeng.flinders.edu.au>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gvinum or vinum in 5.3-STABLE
Message-ID:  <20050215102827.E28871@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050215101842.5823080a@rhino>
References:  <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino> <20050215101842.5823080a@rhino>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030
> Tristan <tris@infoeng.flinders.edu.au> wrote:
> >
> > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ?  Is gvinum
> > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
>
> Does this limitation still exist (from 5.3 ERRATA):
>   While some uncommon configurations, such as multiple vinum
>   drives on a disk, are not supported....

Yes.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050215102827.E28871>