Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:28:00 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R Message-ID: <20040305142800.5291dee8@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEPGFNAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> References: <20040303172340.GC34093@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEPGFNAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500 "fbsd_user" <fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable > release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from > moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that > authorizes the movement of development branch versions to stable > branch? Just what is the time line for 4.x stable versions and the > 5.x development versions? Sure would like an idea of the future so I > can plan the upgrade time line for my environment. > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) > To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> > Cc: security@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Security Officer-supported branches update > Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:12:07 +0100 > Message-ID: <xzpfzcnk0oo.fsf@dwp.des.no> >=20 > Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> writes: > > +------------------------------------------+ > > | Branch | Release | Estimated EoL | > > |----------+-------------+-----------------| > > |RELENG_4 |n/a |October 31, 2004 | > > +------------------------------------------+ >=20 > The actual EoL for RELENG_4 will be much later than that: at least one > year, possibly a year and a half, after the release of 4.10, which is > due this spring / early summer. >=20 > DES > --=20 > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040305142800.5291dee8>