Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:29:57 -0400 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net> To: Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@voicenet.com> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new emerald in ports (0.5.2) + beryl = problem? Message-ID: <1189722597.13714.15.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> In-Reply-To: <1189720835.7484.1.camel@sorrow> References: <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost> <1189720835.7484.1.camel@sorrow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 18:00 -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:28 -0400, Yousif Hassan wrote: > > Hey all: > >=20 > > I took the "chance" of upgrading emerald to 0.5.2 - I'm pretty sure thi= s > > new port revision is in there to eventually support compiz-fusion, whic= h > > is also at 0.5.2 since emerald is now part of that. However, there's > > still a dependency on emerald from the beryl port - and the beryl port > > hasn't moved! > >=20 > > To wit, if you're using Beryl, as I am, there seems to be a problem. > > The new 0.5.2 Emerald decorator doesn't work. I know what the problem > > is, but I can't seem to solve it: > >=20 > > beryl: decoration: property ignored because version is 20070319 and > > decoration plugin version is 20061011 > >=20 > > 20070319 certainly makes sense since this is a new version of emerald, > > but even after updating x11-themes/emerald-themes, I can't get the > > decorations to load. > >=20 > > Is there another module that should be made a dependency that I need to > > update/install? Or is the problem beryl (in which case, it may or may > > not get fixed there...?) > >=20 > > I'm sure this will be sorted out eventually, I just wanted to get the > > ball rolling in case this problem has not been discovered yet. >=20 > Unfortunately there is no fix. The version of emerald for c-f will not > work with beryl. Emerald should be removed as a dependency of the beryl > port, and users will just have to stick with aquamarine and heliodor > (assuming they're even available... I'm not in FreeBSD at the moment to > confirm this). =20 heliodor is in ports, aquamarine is not. emerald is only a dependency of the metaport. robert. > Adam >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBG6bnlM4TrQ4qfROMRAjb+AJ9jsZg7pFxfF7qJxAygxt6N5Mq/BACfal0/ GTfuXoecEg4Hd7njSlZqRsw= =zyXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1189722597.13714.15.camel>