Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:00:45 -0800 (PST) From: <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: knu@idaemons.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/22622: make.conf includes both "optimisation" and "optimization" spellings Message-ID: <200011051800.KAA12639@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: make.conf includes both "optimisation" and "optimization" spellings State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: dougb State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 5 09:55:26 PST 2000 State-Changed-Why: Historically the jury on spelling standardization always comes back hung. In the past we've used either of A) author's preference B) majority rule C) just Americanize and to heck with objections A) doesn't really apply here, B) would swing towards changing the one instance of optimiZation to the s spelling. Personally I've always felt that having one standard is better, but I'm open to suggestions... Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->dougb Responsible-Changed-By: dougb Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Nov 5 09:55:26 PST 2000 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take responsibility for this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=22622 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011051800.KAA12639>