Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:51:59 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Jeff Hartley <jhartley@netrail.net> Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysKonnect and Intel gig boards Message-ID: <20000710175159.A28975@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <MBEJKBIMHAIIJNLIJGDMOEPACAAA.jhartley@netrail.net>; from jhartley@netrail.net on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:26:36PM -0400 References: <MBEJKBIMHAIIJNLIJGDMOEPACAAA.jhartley@netrail.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 19:26:36 -0400, Jeff Hartley wrote: > Anyone have any experience (good/bad/indifferent) with the Intel GigSX > boards, or the SysKonnect dual-port GigSX boards, under 4.0-RELEASE? I'm in > need of quad-gig boxes, and I'm reluctant to stick with 3COM, based on an > unsatisfactory failure rate in the past. Horror stories or blessings, > anyone? I did notice that SysKonnect seems to be friendlier with the > developer community than Intel (go figure). 3Com's 3c985b is really just a rebadged Alteon Tigon II board with 1MB SRAM. The Netgear GA620 is a rebadged Tigon II board with 512K SRAM. FWIW, the Tigon boards work quite well. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000710175159.A28975>