Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 16:14:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Remy Nonnenmacher <remy@synx.com> To: ru@ucb.crimea.ua Cc: noor@NetVision.net.il, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw behavior, is it normal? Message-ID: <199903281422.QAA22223@rt2.synx.com> In-Reply-To: <19990328171210.A55135@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: >> On 28 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > You've screwed your rules up ;-) >> > Rules 400 and 500 are `allow tcp', I suppose. >> > Send us your _real_ rules first. >> > >> >> I think these *ARE* the real rules. Anyway, 'IP' matches all packets.. >> > > You think wrong. I mean: > > # ipfw add 00500 allow ip from any to 1.2.3.4 21 in via xl0 > ipfw: error: only TCP and UDP protocols are valid with port specifications > > Bingo !! [Poor checking...Baf...Baf...] ;). Thanks Ruslan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903281422.QAA22223>