Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:18:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> To: gnn@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A bit of a route socket bug... Message-ID: <20050706121804.C71236@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <m2slysgfh3.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <m2slysgfh3.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Slightly off topic, but have you had a chance to look at that lock recursion bug in the routing code that I had reported awhile ago? Admittedly, I never send-pr'd it. However, I should have the original information around... Perhaps I will test. On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 gnn@freebsd.org wrote: :Howdy, : :As was reported in :http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=%0D%0A82974 : :if you do : :route change 10.3.2.1 127.0.0.1 : :on a system with a default route but no route on the 10 network at :all, you wind up setting the default route to 127.0.0.1 which is :rarely what you want. This is due to the fact that in rtsock.c around :line 431 (in CURRENT) we do a rnh_lookup but don't make sure that the :route we looked up was the one we sought. The radix code correctly :finds the most useful route to 10.3.2.1, i.e the default route, and :the dutifully hoses it. : :The question is, "What's the right fix here?" Right now I'm too tired :to figure it out, so I figure in the 8 hours I'm asleep someone else :might come up with a patch :-) : :Later, :George : :_______________________________________________ :freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list :http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net :To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" : : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050706121804.C71236>