Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:27:05 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com> Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: POSIX Conformance (Unanswered in "questions" so I forwarded...) Message-ID: <l03010602ae9e82698e03@[204.69.236.50]> In-Reply-To: <Pine.AUX.3.94.961031061900.1119B-100000@covina.lightside.com> References: <199610310002.RAA24354@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>TET ... so there is no reason not to make a port out of it, as Terry >suggests. Perhaps I don't understand. Are you suggesting that it be added to the "contrib" tree? If you need to change as much as one line in the makefile, I will argue that it should be placed into "ports" or somewhere higher in the hiearchy. In fact, I can see a value in having "out-of-the-box" programs listed in a special "ports" section just to propogate the knowledge that they work(ed).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010602ae9e82698e03>