Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:53:30 +0100
From:      Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: change to sgml-primer example
Message-ID:  <490EADFA.3020708@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <490E2907.5090907@gmail.com>
References:  <490E2907.5090907@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eitan Adler wrote:
> Can anyone comment on the attached patch to be run from
> /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/sgml-primer

------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- chapter.sgml	2008-10-31 08:23:35.000000000 -0400
+++ newchapter.sgml	2008-11-02 17:21:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -862,6 +862,7 @@

     <example>
       <title>Erroneous SGML comments</title>
+		<para> The SGML parser will treat </para>

       <programlisting><![ CDATA [
 <!-- This is in the comment --
@@ -870,22 +871,21 @@

   -- back inside the comment -->]]></programlisting>

-      <para>The SGML parser will treat this as though it were
actually:</para>
+      <para>as though it were actually:</para>


I would not prefer splitting paragraphs around <programlisting>
elements, as I have already fought against this before [1].


       <programlisting>&lt;!THIS IS OUTSIDE THE COMMENT&gt;</programlisting>

       <para>This is not valid SGML, and may give confusing error
 	messages.</para>

+      <para>Because "--" delimitates the end of a comment do
<emphasis>do not</emphasis> write comments like this: </para>
+
       <programlisting><![ CDATA [<!--------------- This is a very bad
idea --------------->]]></programlisting>

-      <para>As the example suggests, <emphasis>do not</emphasis> write
-	comments like that.</para>

+	<para>This is a (slightly) better approach, but it still potentially
confusing to people new to SGML:</para>

       <programlisting><![ CDATA
[<!--===================================================-->]]></programlisting>

-      <para>That is a (slightly) better approach, but it still potentially
-	confusing to people new to SGML.</para>
     </example>

     <sect2>

In my very humble opinion, I am good with the original text.


Cheers,
:g

[1]
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/sgml-primer/chapter.sgml



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?490EADFA.3020708>