Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:54:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: Steve LaRocca <steve@adpcc.ds.adp.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K Question Message-ID: <36E61736.1A8E4EFE@newsguy.com> References: <XFMail.990309072542.asmodai@wxs.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > On 08-Mar-99 Steve LaRocca wrote: > > We are running several instances FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE (SHAZAM) #0: Fri > > May 16 04:30:51 EDT 1997. I've been to the website and read through your > > Y2K compliance information. However, I'm more of the PC Tech, than a > > UNIX tech. My question therefore is this - based on the version that we > > are running, are there any fixes/patches/upgrades necessary for us to > > perform. The BIOS has been checked and passes the Y2K test we are using. > > Please direct your questions to freebsd-questions next time, thanks. > > There have been some efforts by, I thought, Danial Sobral(sp?) on the Y2k > readiness and it is my firm believe that since the 2.2 branch is officially > declared dead to upgrade to 3.1-STABLE which is believed to be very, very > compliant. The spelling of Sobral is correct, but not of Daniel. :-) And there *was* some effort done with respect to Y2K readyness, but it was _not_ by me. I wish I could assign the correct credits, but my memory is failing me. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36E61736.1A8E4EFE>