Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 11:55:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: signal permissions Message-ID: <14113.63246.592506.386823@avalon.east> References: <14112.52532.671480.997467@avalon.east> <19990424104534.392FF1F0B@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Peter Wemm on Sat, 24 April: : Anthony Kimball wrote: : > : > Here's a trial balloon: Anyone who can write to an executable file : > should be permitted to signal a derived process. : : Umm, do you mean "could if not for ETXTBSY"? I meant 'should...' as in 'a change should be accepted for inclusion into the code base such that...' I don't understand how your 'could...' formulation applies though, even in the absence of ETXTBSY. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14113.63246.592506.386823>