Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:48:03 +0100 From: Martin Faxér <gmh003532@brfmasthugget.se> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-ID: <20020212021146.CD68E9F10C@okeeffe.bestweb.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > > in -current. > > I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -STABLE has it enabled indeed, but -CURRENT does not (afaik). Read what he said. :-) > > -- > | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org > |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212021146.CD68E9F10C>