Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:00:17 +1000
From:      Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: atomic.h vs atomic.s
Message-ID:  <3D999C61.DCA16E15@freebsd.org>
References:  <15768.30116.381592.891890@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <15768.62718.937391.963035@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3D98FD84.D523B8F@freebsd.org> <15769.39791.486131.152431@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Are you saying that the lwarx instruction itself is not atomic wrt to
> interrupts?

 No, I got it wrong, see my previous email.

> More or less..  I could compile about 20 files, then the machine would
> crash.  Once I made it through all the .o's, I couldn't get a kernel
> to link without the machine falling over, so I gave up and used the
> cross compiler/linker that Mark Peek posted last year..

 OK, more bugs to fix :-)

later,

Peter.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ppc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D999C61.DCA16E15>