Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:15:09 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joshua Coombs <jcoombs@gwi.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS Message-ID: <20051206201509.GA78043@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <dn40n8$5rc$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <dn2shd$2sr$1@sea.gmane.org> <20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc> <dn40n8$5rc$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote: >=20 > "Igor Robul" <igorr@speechpro.com> wrote in message=20 > news:20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc... > >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote: > >>#options ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS > >> > >>What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable? The idea of=20 > >>avoiding > >>memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on > >>which any little boost is significant. : ) > >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL > > > >So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore. >=20 > Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to=20 > eliminate that issue. >=20 > What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are=20 > considered stable or not. Yes. Kris --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDlfFNWry0BWjoQKURAh8jAKCjNPXrksmDQcjU9qbD5TywrmJC/wCfdN25 lmC83ReU8UikTtpnMioJqg0= =cJ0m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051206201509.GA78043>