Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:29:48 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: strange behavior of restore(8)
Message-ID:  <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111024141404.GA71953@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
References:  <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>	<CAHhngE3Oub-36fE_X4eT_4r8LygQ7D1dbcWjdTn3KCeE95J9uQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20111022053315.GA30712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>	<20111023161312.GA46735@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>	<20111023162242.GA3823@tinyCurrent>	<20111024122448.GA70524@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1110240753500.69508@wonkity.com> <20111024141404.GA71953@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/24/2011 10:14 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Warren Block wrote:
>>
>>> Lo and behold! On an amd64 system with 8GB RAM and 2 2.66GHz Xeon
>>> CPUs, "restore -rNf home.dmp" has successfully completed after 3 hours
>>> 15 minutes.
>>
>> What are the specs for the system that wrote the dumpfile originally 
> 
> 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64, 8GB RAM and 2xXeon 2.66GHz
> 
>> and the system that couldn't restore it?
> 
> FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p10 i386, 256M RAM, Pentium II 350.80MHz (yes,
> it's pretty old).

ufs1 vs ufs2 ?  Also if there are a lot of files, restore needs quite a
bit of RAM.

	---Mike


-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA5765C.20701>