Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:27:19 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <CAN6yY1u01WkywPM5J62cBOpqL6Gc5x9yYPhhXv0aAceYhFYCgQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <520BDEAE.9000104@freebsd.org> References: <520A6D07.5080106@freebsd.org> <520AFBE8.1090109@freebsd.org> <520B24A0.4000706@freebsd.org> <520B3056.1000804@freebsd.org> <520BDEAE.9000104@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>wrote: > On 8/14/13 3:23 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >> On 08/14/13 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> They switched to using an initial window of 10 segments some time ago. >>>> FreeBSD starts with 3 or more recently, 10 if you're running recent >>>> 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT. >>>> >>> I tried setting initial values as shown: >>> net.inet.tcp.local_slowstart_**flightsize: 10 >>> net.inet.tcp.slowstart_**flightsize: 10 >>> it didn't seem to make too much difference but I will redo the test. >>> >> Assuming this is still FreeBSD 8.0 as you mentioned out-of-band, >> changing those variables without disabling rfc3390 will have no effect. >> >> I think (check the driver code in question as I'm not sure) that if you >> "ifconfig <if> lro" and the driver has hardware support or has been made >> aware of our software implementation, it should DTRT. >> > > so I ran on 9.2-beta ( a week or two old) and it had similar problems.. > only worse.. 9.2 actually sends multiple packets when is doesn't need to.. > http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/fbsd9.png > Ack! (Sorry) I could have sworn that this had been fixed. Has it been re-broken? -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1u01WkywPM5J62cBOpqL6Gc5x9yYPhhXv0aAceYhFYCgQ>