Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:26:00 -0800 From: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention. Message-ID: <AANLkTikkpbJV0v1=mBc%2BnFBh_diyAjUjaN8BUKwEZZhp@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com> <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree. Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too. https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz --Artem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikkpbJV0v1=mBc%2BnFBh_diyAjUjaN8BUKwEZZhp>