Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:12:08 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ache@nagual.pp.ru, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tk80 port or tcl installation are broken on -current Message-ID: <14994.884221928@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 1998 16:57:55 PST." <199801080057.QAA16952@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Why? It seems that things were fine until you rocked the boat with > * a bsd.port.mk that tried to be too clever at detecting this. :) > > Um, did you read the message? That has nothing to do with my change, > Jordan. I know, but the topic only seems to have flared up again on account of it. :) Yes, I see the problem. No, I see no immediate solution that doesn't have drawbacks of its own. Yes, I hate this entire problem and would just as soon say "heck, just nuke TCL out of the base OS" if I had a way of handling dist/ports dependencies currently in the tree. The fact that I don't is why so many people are complaining that the Handbook and FAQ have been left out of the doc dist since 2.2.2. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14994.884221928>