Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:36:10 +0100
From:      Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk>
To:        Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject:   Re: 7+ days of dogfood
Message-ID:  <BDF5750D-BC0A-4517-AFBD-CC2F420C4463@cederstrand.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20130211190741.379ee35c@X220.ovitrap.com>
References:  <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130210083010.7df5b997@X220.ovitrap.com> <256C7A7B-DFA7-4C0F-B389-AB10E0DA42D0@cederstrand.dk> <20130211063858.0375a6ed@X220.ovitrap.com> <88F312FE-E783-4C24-8964-BBDE4DE6653E@cederstrand.dk> <20130211190741.379ee35c@X220.ovitrap.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Den 11/02/2013 kl. 13.07 skrev Erich Dollansky =
<erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>:

> ok, I agree that developers could react faster some times. But, isn't
> it more important that the errors are caught at all?

Yes. As long as there is no alternative, the best motivation to fix a =
bug is when you just spent 20 minutes recovering your laptop from a =
crash.

I just believe more people would be motivated to run CURRENT if there =
was at least some basic runtime resting. Just like the tinderboxes save =
developer CPU cycles by saying "Don't bother with this revision, it =
doesn't compile", I think runtime tests would save real developer time =
by saying "Don't bother with this revision, it doesn't boot" or "Don't =
bother with this revision, gcc can't compile hello-world.cpp". Which =
doesn't imply that automated testing would catch all errors.

> So, the best is still if people like me are eating dog food and start
> complaining?
>=20
> Do not get me wrong here. I do not complain about the fact that there
> might be an error, I want to help poin-point the error with my
> complaint.

As I started out, I admire the work you and others are doing by running =
CURRENT and reporting and fixing errors. At the same time, I look to =
e.g. LLVM and their "no commit without a regression test" goal and think =
we could do way better :-)

Erik=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BDF5750D-BC0A-4517-AFBD-CC2F420C4463>