Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:56:34 -0800 From: Beech Rintoul <beech@alaskaparadise.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questiion about followup pr Message-ID: <200605142256.36615.beech@alaskaparadise.com> In-Reply-To: <20060515060659.GA29669@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200605121400.13134.beech@alaskaparadise.com> <20060515060659.GA29669@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1206881.4VxTm2sig2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:06, you wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > What is the accepted way to send a patch with a followup to a pr? The > > system seems to mangle them badly either pasted in the mail or attached? > > Pasted in the mail. What exactly do you mean by "mangle"? I tried both pasting and attaching. Both came out with extra characters. I'= m=20 using kmail and haven't had a problem with it before. In the future should = I=20 use another mailer? Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1206881.4VxTm2sig2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEaCYkp5D0B1NlT4URAnRIAJ91G5mNivvJhebbM18qpg0S6UB2WQCfRuHu KSenhHNIGvn0Lefc1LnckpI= =pe3m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1206881.4VxTm2sig2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605142256.36615.beech>