Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:07:49 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?B?VGphZG8gTcOkY2tl?= <tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net>
To:        Guillaume Seigneuret <gs@omegacube.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
Message-ID:  <4C1E4AE5.8060300@maecke.net>
In-Reply-To: <000401cb1091$c5ae06d0$510a1470$@fr>
References:  <AANLkTimMZKyYpG52Xf3pJsiJjYiBuoooOuJQdV8gjrv4@mail.gmail.com>	<010101cb0fb1$e015e370$a041aa50$@fr>	<AANLkTinqzrvXwUkbIXJISn2k-xhTqt3-q7omRXGU95p6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinTKwLrZaclBh70AnRBqwDRAQrUP4JuyYSiIqnF@mail.gmail.com> <4C1E2575.2070405@maecke.net> <000301cb1090$df239fe0$9d6adfa0$@fr> <4C1E3A51.8080905@maecke.net> <000401cb1091$c5ae06d0$510a1470$@fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I didn't do any tests in general. I used for a while FreeBSD HVM (and
other os guests...) under xen-3.2.1. There I got problems that VM's
react very slowly under ZFS/UFS I/O stress (tar of logs, etc...) till I
need to reboot the guest. It was under FreeBSD 7.2 with ZFS beta but 8.0
didn't worked with that xen/kernel. The last weeks I tried Xen 4.0.0 but
tap:aio and tap:tapdisk:aio cause complete host kernel crashes under I/O
stress (dd if /dev/zero...). With Xen-4.0.1-rc3-pre I haven't these
problems, FreeBSD 8 is working (so booting works ;) and states/times
seems a lot more healthier.

Softs: Webserver with a top 5000 (alexa) site (high db access - cached,
some I/O because of downloads), high threaded game server (for wc3),
mail server and other webservers/stuff...

Am 20.06.2010 18:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
> Could you tell us what did you do to test the stability ?
> Softs running on it, who many time and with who many users using it ?
>
> Thanks by advance.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Guillaume Seigneuret
>
>
>
> Network and System Security Architect
> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
> Address :
> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
> Technopôle de Château Gombert
> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net] 
> Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 17:57
> À : Guillaume Seigneuret
> Cc : 'Pandu Poluan'; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
>
> I mean stable in a general way not for FreeBSD (didn't tried out it in
> PV yet).
>
> tjado
>
> Am 20.06.2010 17:54, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
>   
>> I did try with Xen 4.0.0.
>> But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ...
>> I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under paravirtualized environment.
>> It's not really a question of Xen kernel version.
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> Guillaume Seigneuret
>>
>>
>>
>> Network and System Security Architect
>> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
>> Address :
>> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
>> Technopôle de Château Gombert
>> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net] 
>> Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28
>> À : Guillaume Seigneuret
>> Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
>> Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable
>> than 4.0.0.
>> Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try
>> this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268
>>
>> tjado
>>
>> Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
>>   
>>     
>>> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers
>>> for the moment.
>>> For information I did try :
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on :
>>>
>>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on :
>>>
>>>    -
>>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne
>>>
>>>
>>> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM
>>> partitions.
>>> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210.
>>>
>>> Cordialement,
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>   




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C1E4AE5.8060300>