Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:29:36 -0400
From:      Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
To:        Alex Keahan <alex@hightemplar.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP:  ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history
Message-ID:  <20040626192936.GA24837@online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200406261906.32590.alex@hightemplar.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Keahan wrote:
> You can use Sun's compilers for Intel to generate x86 assembly code and
> (with a little bit of tweaking) assemble it with gas to create a native
> FreeBSD binary.   Last time I did that (ca. 2000), I measured a 20-30%
> improvement in run-time execution speed.

I get that improvement using gcc3 over gcc2 on intel.  In fact, gcc
these days, on my code, is a bit faster than Intel's compiler.  

Even on Solaris/sparc, I know many people who prefer gcc to Sun's
compilers (perhaps not for speed reasons, but people who want
numbercrunching speed don't use sparc any more anyway...)

Rahul



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040626192936.GA24837>