Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:46:24 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reducing compiler instances during buildkernel Message-ID: <20111107074624.GB91353@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20111105223021.GA52651@freebsd.org> References: <20111105223021.GA52651@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Nov-05 22:30:21 +0000, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: >wouldn't it be possible to somehow spawn N gcc or clang instances >(make -jN buildkernel) and then pipe the src to one of those N instances? >just like with something like multics N processes were started and then pe= ople >used the job control language to load binaries into those processes. This is likely to require very non-trivial changes to gcc or clang. The major issue is that the process needs to be in a known initial state before beginning a compile - and it's very unlikely that the compiler cleans itself up enough to return to that state. If you really want to trim low-hanging fruit, try disposing of libtool and GNU configure instead - their overheads are _many_ orders of magnitude higher than make exec()ing gcc. --=20 Peter Jeremy --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk63jNAACgkQ/opHv/APuIcl+QCgiX+g1iNm47KV5GIA+yaJ474r CVUAoKQJQXVAkJfvFBhqbB1iUV5DAy/U =G+sz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111107074624.GB91353>