Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:49:23 -0700
From:      Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>
To:        Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc:        Bill Moran <wmoran@iowna.com>, patl@Phoenix.Volant.ORG, Josh Thomas <jdt2101@ksu.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPFW rules and outward connections
Message-ID:  <20010608094923.A3102@tao.thought.org>
In-Reply-To: <001201c0efda$63e90b20$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>; from tedm@toybox.placo.com on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:18:02PM -0700
References:  <3B200EEF.86F950D1@iowna.com> <001201c0efda$63e90b20$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:18:02PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I'll relate a recent story security and access lists that may
> interest some folks.
> 
	[[ ... ]]

> This is the kind of mentality that your dealing with, with most crackers.
> Sure, there's some really good (or warped) crackers out there who would
> have reactivated their little toy in seconds.  But these people aren't
> going to waste their time on something like this site.  The real mentality
> that your dealing with, with 99% of these crackers out there are people
> so dumb that they cannot even make a simple port number modification in
> their code.  They barely have any understanding of networking technology and
> even crude and simple access lists are beyond their comprehension.  All
> they do is to follow some recipies that their betters have put together
> for them, and if something goes wrong and the recipie doesen't work, they
> have no idea how to go about fixing it (or breaking the system, depending
> on your viewpoint) and so they just move on to the next easy-to-compromise
> system.
> 
> This is really the situation of the street where half the homes lock their
> doors and the other half don't.  There are so very many ancient Linux or
> unsecured Windows systems out there that if you make even a modicum of
> effort
> to lock your door, since most crackers are basically morons, they are
> unable to deal with the situation and just move on to the next house/system.

	[[ ... ]]


> [T]he point is that Hollywood makes it out that all crackers are
> super-sophisticated
> technologists that know computer systems back, forth and upside down, and
> that to block them you have to have super-sophisticated methods yourself.
> But, the reality is that most crackers are morons and even simple
> filters and blocks that aren't themselves that good, present enough of an
> obstacle
> to these people that they won't be able to figure out a way around them.
> 

	Thanks for your tale.   It supports my theory that the overwhelming
	number of crackers are adolescents (of whatever age) who have time
	on their hasnds.   --Of course this does not sell newspapers,
	air-time, or movies... .

	gary

> 

-- 
   Gary D. Kline    kline@thought.org  www.thought.org    Public service Unix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010608094923.A3102>