Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 02:40:29 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: jobaldwi@vt.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revisiting Motif policy in ports Message-ID: <199904270940.CAA23892@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904230520.WAA64167@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (message from Steve Kargl on Thu, 22 Apr 1999 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)) References: <199904230520.WAA64167@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> * No. If you don't have HAVE_MOTIF in /etc/make.conf, then you get: * * cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit * make install * nedit-5.0.2 requires motif. * * I think the last line should at least be changed to advertise * the availability of LessTif. * * cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit * make install * nedit-5.0.2 requires motif. LessTif is a LGPL implementation * of the Motif API. A port is available in ports/x11-toolkits/lesstif. * See /etc/make.conf. I think this is a good idea. Is this wording OK for everyone? (I'll substitute "${PORTSDIR}/" for the "ports/" part above.) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904270940.CAA23892>