Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:55:33 +0200 From: Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> To: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.java.mk 2.0 Message-ID: <20031007105533.GA73813@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> In-Reply-To: <200310061709.43083.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> References: <200309240954.45634.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20030925152156.GA59287@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> <20031006145325.GA40341@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> <200310061709.43083.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Another release! The web page also has been updated: http://www.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~hquiroz/freebsd/bsd.java.mk-2.0.html It now contains a simple example (that I "stole" from Ernst's bsd.java.mk original page) and a more detailed "Java porter's manual". Regarding bsd.java.mk itself, here is the status: CHANGES: 2003-10-06: - Done some cleanning (final release deadline is near!) - More verbose (and better formatted) 'java-debug' target - Now using ${VAR:Mpattern} for pattern detection instead of tr|grep (JAVA_VERSION, JAVA_VENDOR, JAVA_OS...) - JAVA_PORT_OS is now set to the OS keyword (use _JAVA_VENDOR_keyword for complete OS name) - Two new variables (stage 5): JAVA_PORT_VENDOR_DESCRIPTION and JAVA_PORT_OS_DESCRIPTION (respective full names) - Changed the way '+' is handled in JAVA_VERSION (no more _JAVA_PORTS_1_x_UP variables) -> easier to maintain - Changed _JAVA_PORT_xxx_META to _JAVA_PORT_xxx_INFO (just personal preference) TODO: - Implement a sorting mechanism for JDK port selection - Handle JDK/JRE - Decide definitively the name/keyword for JDK vendors (and then rename JDK ports in bsd.java.mk) - Handle installed JDK ports using metainformation available - Decide if we get rid of the JAVA_HOME overide stuff - Handle the case where no JDK port is suitable (whenever the port is broken) Herve PS: Ernst, I hope you don't mind my plagiarism of your page. If this is the case, please let me know... On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:09:43PM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > All, > > From my PoV the current bsd.java.mk 2.0 is as good as usable. If this > assumption is correct (please confirm!), then I suggest we commit > bsd.java.mk 2.0 this week. > > Please test this as much as possible! > > Ernst >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031007105533.GA73813>