Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:38:16 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange behavior of restore(8) Message-ID: <20111024143816.GA72280@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net> References: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <CAHhngE3Oub-36fE_X4eT_4r8LygQ7D1dbcWjdTn3KCeE95J9uQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111022053315.GA30712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023161312.GA46735@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023162242.GA3823@tinyCurrent> <20111024122448.GA70524@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110240753500.69508@wonkity.com> <20111024141404.GA71953@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> > >>> Lo and behold! On an amd64 system with 8GB RAM and 2 2.66GHz Xeon > >>> CPUs, "restore -rNf home.dmp" has successfully completed after 3 hours > >>> 15 minutes. > >> > >> What are the specs for the system that wrote the dumpfile originally > > > > 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64, 8GB RAM and 2xXeon 2.66GHz > > > >> and the system that couldn't restore it? > > > > FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p10 i386, 256M RAM, Pentium II 350.80MHz (yes, > > it's pretty old). > > ufs1 vs ufs2 ? UFS2 on the first host, irrelevant on the second host (I was trying "restore -rN"). > Also if there are a lot of files, restore needs quite a bit of RAM. I should think so, but it generated no errors or "out of swap" messages. It was just running forever. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111024143816.GA72280>