Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:10:30 -0700
From:      perryh@pluto.rain.com
To:        jcw@speakeasy.net
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Typical Network Performance
Message-ID:  <4c5f8dc6.IUSZ/egsTlgYHE/G%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C5F7141.9030203@speakeasy.net>
References:  <4C55E4B5.7000201@speakeasy.net> <8627B125-F3BB-42B2-98CF-600E21A93A2D@hiwaay.net> <AANLkTi=g%2BBGLJRQfyz7v3dSQ6k%2BxNQzVEEnSBdxpJfGF@mail.gmail.com> <5628C9CD-0F16-4C0E-8B89-B4ECCA35C933@hiwaay.net> <4C5F7141.9030203@speakeasy.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jason C. Wells" <jcw@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> By process of elimination (swap cables, swap ports, try different
> host pairs) I was able to discover that a single server on my home
> LAN was getting about 1.6% performance compared to other servers
> getting 94%
...
> What would be the next step to figuring out why this host's network
> performance is slow?

My next step would be to check whether this host and its hub/switch
port agree on speed and duplex -- occasionally some combination
of netcard phy and switch type gets the negotiation wrong.  Duplex
mismatch, in particular, can have huge performance impact.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c5f8dc6.IUSZ/egsTlgYHE/G%perryh>