Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:20:45 +0100 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: MK_NETGRAPH and MK_ATM/MK_BLUETOOTH Message-ID: <f19c444a1001101220x57fcb25p26935b6b085e35db@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there, I am looking at PR 137487, world broken WITHOUT_NETGRAPH. Is it reasonable to have MK_NETGRAPH=no enforce MK_ATM=no and MK_BLUETOOTH=no? The bluetooth stack is implemented using the netgraph framework. Some bluetooth userland tools include netgraph headers or use netgraph sockets. There are 2 ATM stacks, netnatm and netgraph/atm. netgraph/atm obviously uses netgraph. For netnatm, this is not clear if there is a dependency: atmconfig(8) includes netgraph headers and some files in sys/contrib/ngatm/netnatm also include netgraph headers. Thanks in advance, Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19c444a1001101220x57fcb25p26935b6b085e35db>